You must acknowledge this legal disclaimer before continuing to access resources provided on this website.
The resources provided on this website are provided for educational and informational purposes only. The information and services on this website are not intended to and shall not be used as legal or financial advice. You use the content, information and services on this website at your own risk. You acknowledge that under no circumstances is AIIA, its agents, affiliates or customers, providing legal or financial advice or representation through this website, and that nothing on this website is intended as a substitute for legal or financial advice from the appropriate licensed professionals. AIIA SHALL NOT BE LIABLE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES TO YOU FOR ANY RELIANCE ON INFORMATION CONTAINED ON OR OBTAINED THROUGH THIS WEBSITE. ANY SUCH RELIANCE SHALL BE SOLELY AT YOUR OWN RISK.
You acknowledge that no attorney-client relationship or fiduciary relationship is, or will be, formed through the use of this website, and that you have no expectation of privacy or confidentiality of communications occurring through the website.
Some of the content on this website may be password-protected. In some instances, AIIA may have compensated authors for creating specialized content and access may be restricted to AIIA members only whose donations help cover the costs associated with creating the specialized content.
As immigration requirements and financial topics are always evolving, AIIA cannot and does not guarantee or warrant the accuracy, reliability, completeness, or currentness of information or services provided on this website. It is the user’s sole responsibility to obtain independent legal and financial advice that is tailored to their unique circumstances. YOUR USE OF THE INFORMATION AND SERVICES ON THIS WEBSITE IS AT YOUR OWN RISK. UNLESS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED OTHERWISE IN A WRITING BY AIIA, ALL INFORMATION, SERVICES, AND CONTENT ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED.
AIIA may list, feature, or otherwise include industry professionals on this website, such listings do not constitute professional referral, advertising or solicitation of any kind. AIIA does not earn any direct commissions or fees from such listings.
AIIA may post on the website certain information for current and prospective investors and other industry participants about the structure of EB-5 investments and operation of the EB-5 investor-immigrant visa program. Such information may include qualifying investments, information on specific projects, and about disputes and litigation involving immigration and investment matters. None of this information is intended to, or be relied upon, as legal or investment advice. Users are solely responsible for seeking the appropriate licensed professional for their situation and investment projects.
By accessing any information on the site, you agree that under no circumstances will AIIA and its officers, directors, employees, consultants and agents be liable to you under any theory of liability (whether based in contract, tort, negligence, warranty, or otherwise) for any costs, damages, or liability of any kind, including, without limitation, loss of any kind.
For more information see our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
In contrast to a lawsuit where several investors are “pooled” together and join in a single lawsuit against an investment issuer, there is also the option of one or more investors filing a “class action” lawsuit where a single investor can serve as the representative of a “class” of all other “similarly situated” investors.
Class action litigation – especially in the EB-5 context where securities, corporate and immigration law intersect – is extremely complex and few attorneys are sufficiently well-versed to handle it. While it has its challenges, there are also tremendous benefits that come with filing a class action.
Not all cases may be subjected to “class” treatment. There are very strict and demanding obligations that one must meet before a court will allow a single person to stand in the shoes of many others and make legal decisions on their behalf. In addition to the “commonality” requirement noted in the “pooled” litigation page, class actions also require meeting several other criteria. These include “numerosity” (the size of the class must be of a sufficient size), “typicality” (the representative must be typical of all the other members of the class) and “superiority” (a class action must be a superior litigation method compared to others). Each of these criteria are nuanced and can be applied differently in practice.
If a case can be brought on a “class-wide” basis, the economics of doing so differ greatly as compared to a “pooled” litigation. First, by bringing the case on behalf of an entire class of investors – i.e., potentially all of the investors in a particular failed project – the plaintiffs have acquired leverage that can be met and often exceeds that of the investment issuer. In other words, by proceeding as a “class”, the plaintiffs’ case represents a much larger risk to the investment issuer than if only one or a group of investors filed suit. This can dramatically affect the litigation, add pressure on the investment issuer to settle and help resolve the case quicker.
Secondly, attorneys who specialize in class action litigation frequently accept engagements on a contingency basis, meaning they do not get paid unless they are successful. And while the expenses of litigating a class case can be high, the attorneys will frequently front them, meaning that the clients do not pay any of the expenses associated with litigation (such as court costs, depositions, travel, translators, expert witnesses, etc.). Only if the suit is successful will a typical class counsel get paid for their time and be reimbursed for the expenses they had to lay out. These amounts are taken from the total recovery. In addition, the attorneys will only get paid and reimbursed after the class has been informed of the amounts at issue and after the court has approved it. In other words, by filing a class action, investors bear little financial risk in filing the lawsuit and can rely on numerous court-ordered protections to make sure that the fees and expenses that are eventually paid (if the suit is successful) are reasonable and appropriate.
When specialized class counsel (who are also well-versed in immigration, securities and corporate law) agree to accept a complex and costly case on contingency, it is frequently a strong indication that the attorneys believe in the case and expect that it will be successful.
For EB-5 Investors

EB-5 investments are direct or regional center types; regional centers pool funds and count indirect jobs, while direct requires active management and counts direct jobs only.
Learn More
Thinking about doing EB-5? Get started here!
Learn MoreUse this tool before to find the most applicable EB-5 resource for your needs.
If you have any questions, inquiries, or collaboration proposals, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us.