Investment and Securities > Sustainment and Redeployment

EB-5 投资资本的重新部署和维持问题

我们的奋斗目标

The convoluted landscape of EB-5 investments is exemplified by the ever-present issues caused by redeployment and sustainment periods. Both of these practices have created a system where financial imperatives and regulatory demands clash, often to the detriment of investors and the integrity of the EB-5 program itself. A culture of financial scrutiny, intertwined with a regulatory framework lacking in adaptability, has led to a scenario where the redeployment of capital after the initial investment becomes a formidable challenge. The politicization of economic policies and a lack of evidence-based evaluation result in a one-way march towards ever more complex redeployment strategies.

Investors navigating the EB-5 world find themselves trapped in a web of uncertainties, where the need for sustained job creation collides with the realities of capital redeployment in an ever-shifting economic landscape. The financial stakes are monumental, and the burden falls disproportionately on those who seek to secure their future in the United States through lawful investment channels. However, the recent political shifts and evolving EB-5 market have combined to create a pivotal juncture, perhaps the best opportunity in years, to reassess and reform the practice of sustained investments.

Far too many investors are left grappling with the challenges of redeploying capital in manners that comply with regulatory requirements while striving to maintain their funds. The opaque nature of redeployment strategies and the associated sustainment periods often jeopardize the financial health and security of investors. The effects of such challenges, particularly on projects aiming to create jobs and stimulate economic growth, are well known. Investors face significant financial hurdles and uncertainties, contributing to needless economic strain and, in some cases, the failure of promising ventures.

Investors’ rights to transparent information, reliable investment options, and a fair and predictable regulatory environment are often curtailed beyond what is necessary for program integrity. Not only are these activities crucial for investors to retain trust in the EB-5 program, but they also contribute to the overall success and sustainability of the program by fostering confidence among potential investors. The need for reform and a recalibration of the EB-5 landscape is evident, urging stakeholders to collaborate on solutions that strike a balance between economic vitality and regulatory compliance.

投资与证券新闻和文章

2025 年 8 月有关持续期诉讼的最新情况--EB-5 投资者需要做什么

美国投资移民协会(AIIA)反对美国投资移民协会(IIUSA)关于延长 EB-5 持续期的诉讼,并提交了一份法庭之友简报,帮助雷耶斯法官做出裁决,确认了《区域投资协定》中关于后《区域投资协定》投资者的两年风险规则。美国移民局现在将起草正式法规,美国投资移民协会计划在公开征求意见期间动员投资者,以保护这一解释免受行业反弹。.

IIUSA 未能与移民局就维持期达成协议

美国投资移民协会(AIIA)正在反对美国投资移民协会(IIUSA)的一项诉讼,该诉讼可能会延长《美国投资移民法案》生效后投资者的 EB-5 维持期,破坏国会制定的 2 年规则。最近的听证会对我方不利,虽然目前的规则仍然有效,但和解或法院裁决可能会恢复到《美国投资移民法案》生效前的有害时限,因此 AIIA 正在准备法律和宣传行动,以保护所有投资者。.

IIUSA 诉移民局维持诉讼的最新情况

2025 年 1 月 28 日,IIUSA 诉 USCIS 一案的法庭听证会对国土安全部的两年维持解释提出了质疑,这有可能导致投资期限更长、重新部署风险更大的 EB-5 投资者回到 RIA 之前的规则。美国投资移民协会正在通过法律行动进行反击,并需要您的支持以保护 EB-5 投资者。.

美国投资移民协会(IIUSA)与美国移民局(USCIS)关于 EB-5 持续期的诉讼分析(第二部分

请阅读我们对 IIUSA 支持诉讼申诉的两部分分析的第二部分,我们认为他们的逻辑是错误的,以及我们计划如何确保 EB-5 投资者的权利在此过程中得到保护。.

美国投资移民协会(IIUSA)与美国移民局(USCIS)关于 EB-5 持续期的诉讼分析(第一部分

请阅读我们对 IIUSA 支持诉讼申诉的两部分分析的第一部分,我们认为他们的逻辑是错误的,以及我们计划如何确保 EB-5 投资者的权利在此过程中得到保护。.

区域中心提起诉讼,要求恢复《反垄断法》实施后投资者的维持期规则

投资美国(IIUSA)是一个代表众多 EB-5 区域中心的组织,该组织刚刚就更新的维持期澄清对美国移民局提起诉讼。我们认为该诉讼有可能严重损害 EB-5 投资者的经济利益,请阅读本博客了解原因。.

特色投资和证券资源

与专业人士联系

美国投资移民协会(AIIA)为所有 EB-5 利益相关者准备了一份从律师、投资专家到商业计划书撰写者的顶级专业人士名单。

专业人员名录

Directory of Professionals

美国投资移民协会(AIIA)为所有 EB-5 利益相关者准备了一份从律师、投资专家到商业计划书撰写者的顶级专业人士名单。

查看专业人员名录

常见问题

Why are redeployment and sustainment periods such major issues in the EB-5 program?

Redeployment and sustainment rules have become two of the most complex and controversial aspects of the EB-5 program. Investors are required to keep their funds “at risk” for extended periods, often beyond the original project’s timeline. When the first investment ends before immigration approval, funds must be redeployed—creating confusion, legal risk, and financial uncertainty. This combination has made compliance burdensome and sometimes detrimental to investors’ interests.

Why is reform of redeployment and sustainment policies so urgently needed?

Current redeployment and sustainment practices lack transparency, adaptability, and fairness, leading to uncertainty for investors and instability for projects. Reform would establish clearer rules, greater flexibility, and stronger investor protections, ensuring that EB-5 participants are not penalized for circumstances beyond their control. A more predictable system would also restore confidence in the EB-5 program as a viable pathway for both immigration and investment.

联系我们

如果您有任何问题、咨询或合作建议,请随时联系我们。

联系我们