EB-5 问题
EB-5 投资资本的重新部署和维持问题
The convoluted landscape of EB-5 investments is exemplified by the ever-present issues caused by redeployment and sustainment periods. Both of these practices have created a system where financial imperatives and regulatory demands clash, often to the detriment of investors and the integrity of the EB-5 program itself. A culture of financial scrutiny, intertwined with a regulatory framework lacking in adaptability, has led to a scenario where the redeployment of capital after the initial investment becomes a formidable challenge. The politicization of economic policies and a lack of evidence-based evaluation result in a one-way march towards ever more complex redeployment strategies.
Investors navigating the EB-5 world find themselves trapped in a web of uncertainties, where the need for sustained job creation collides with the realities of capital redeployment in an ever-shifting economic landscape. The financial stakes are monumental, and the burden falls disproportionately on those who seek to secure their future in the United States through lawful investment channels. However, the recent political shifts and evolving EB-5 market have combined to create a pivotal juncture, perhaps the best opportunity in years, to reassess and reform the practice of sustained investments.
Far too many investors are left grappling with the challenges of redeploying capital in manners that comply with regulatory requirements while striving to maintain their funds. The opaque nature of redeployment strategies and the associated sustainment periods often jeopardize the financial health and security of investors. The effects of such challenges, particularly on projects aiming to create jobs and stimulate economic growth, are well known. Investors face significant financial hurdles and uncertainties, contributing to needless economic strain and, in some cases, the failure of promising ventures.
Investors’ rights to transparent information, reliable investment options, and a fair and predictable regulatory environment are often curtailed beyond what is necessary for program integrity. Not only are these activities crucial for investors to retain trust in the EB-5 program, but they also contribute to the overall success and sustainability of the program by fostering confidence among potential investors. The need for reform and a recalibration of the EB-5 landscape is evident, urging stakeholders to collaborate on solutions that strike a balance between economic vitality and regulatory compliance.
新闻室

美国投资移民协会(AIIA)反对美国投资移民协会(IIUSA)关于延长 EB-5 持续期的诉讼,并提交了一份法庭之友简报,帮助雷耶斯法官做出裁决,确认了《区域投资协定》中关于后《区域投资协定》投资者的两年风险规则。美国移民局现在将起草正式法规,美国投资移民协会计划在公开征求意见期间动员投资者,以保护这一解释免受行业反弹。.

美国投资移民协会(AIIA)正在反对美国投资移民协会(IIUSA)的一项诉讼,该诉讼可能会延长《美国投资移民法案》生效后投资者的 EB-5 维持期,破坏国会制定的 2 年规则。最近的听证会对我方不利,虽然目前的规则仍然有效,但和解或法院裁决可能会恢复到《美国投资移民法案》生效前的有害时限,因此 AIIA 正在准备法律和宣传行动,以保护所有投资者。.

2025 年 1 月 28 日,IIUSA 诉 USCIS 一案的法庭听证会对国土安全部的两年维持解释提出了质疑,这有可能导致投资期限更长、重新部署风险更大的 EB-5 投资者回到 RIA 之前的规则。美国投资移民协会正在通过法律行动进行反击,并需要您的支持以保护 EB-5 投资者。.

请阅读我们对 IIUSA 支持诉讼申诉的两部分分析的第二部分,我们认为他们的逻辑是错误的,以及我们计划如何确保 EB-5 投资者的权利在此过程中得到保护。.

请阅读我们对 IIUSA 支持诉讼申诉的两部分分析的第一部分,我们认为他们的逻辑是错误的,以及我们计划如何确保 EB-5 投资者的权利在此过程中得到保护。.

投资美国(IIUSA)是一个代表众多 EB-5 区域中心的组织,该组织刚刚就更新的维持期澄清对美国移民局提起诉讼。我们认为该诉讼有可能严重损害 EB-5 投资者的经济利益,请阅读本博客了解原因。.

美国投资移民协会与公民和移民服务监察员(CISOMB)的第二次会议涉及的议题包括维持期、老龄化、资金来源和路径问题,以及 EB-5 投资者在申请受理和裁决方面的透明度。.

EB-5 改革与诚信法案》(RIA)引入了一些变化,但对投资者,尤其是《改革与诚信法案》之前的投资者的影响仍不明确。AIIA 提出了有关投资期限、持续要求和区域中心终止的影响等问题。.

EB-5 重新部署问题摘要,讨论 EB-5 投资者必须在一定时间内保持其投资资金。这对投资者来说是个问题,因为 EB-5 申请的处理时间可能会很长。美国投资移民协会正在游说修改重新部署政策,使投资者受益。.
面向 EB-5 利益相关者

高危 "要求、重新部署条款、潜在欺诈、延迟处理、申请被拒、子女老龄化。.
了解更多
提前提取 EB-5 资金通常比较困难,因为资金已投入到项目中,必须保持 "风险",但只有在违反合同或发行人的拒绝缺乏合法商业理由的情况下,投资者才可要求还款。在有限的情况下可以提起诉讼,但投资者必须拿出有力的证据,否则就有可能被拒绝并承担额外的法律费用。
了解更多
当 NCE 经理在没有适当判断的情况下对 EB-5 资金进行再投资,从而使投资者面临不必要的风险时,尽管合同规定了广泛的自由裁量权,重新部署诉讼还是会出现。投资者可能会提出索赔--尤其是当管理者恶意行事、尽职调查不力或强行做出危害移民或财务结果的重新部署决定时。
了解更多
美国投资移民协会(AIIA)为所有 EB-5 利益相关者准备了一份从律师、投资专家到商业计划书撰写者的顶级专业人士名单。
查看专业人员名录Redeployment and sustainment rules have become two of the most complex and controversial aspects of the EB-5 program. Investors are required to keep their funds “at risk” for extended periods, often beyond the original project’s timeline. When the first investment ends before immigration approval, funds must be redeployed—creating confusion, legal risk, and financial uncertainty. This combination has made compliance burdensome and sometimes detrimental to investors’ interests.
Current redeployment and sustainment practices lack transparency, adaptability, and fairness, leading to uncertainty for investors and instability for projects. Reform would establish clearer rules, greater flexibility, and stronger investor protections, ensuring that EB-5 participants are not penalized for circumstances beyond their control. A more predictable system would also restore confidence in the EB-5 program as a viable pathway for both immigration and investment.
如果您有任何问题、咨询或合作建议,请随时联系我们。